USPTO serial 76001971
E-ABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-ABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R J Heher
R J HEHER FENWICK & W LLPTWO PALO ALTO SQSTE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing multiple user access to a global computer information network; providing access to and leasing access time to computer databases and networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, designing and implementing web pages for others; testing computer hardware and software for others; testing computer hardware and software for others; hosting of web sites for others on a global computer network; providing advice and consulting services in the fields of information technology, computers, computing and computer programming; management, maintenance and monitoring of communication and computer networks; management of internal and global computer networks; computer services, namely, providing computer software applications to others over communications and global computer networks; integration of computer systems and networks; computer network security; communications and computer networks audit; communications and computer network design; computer services, namely, design of computer hardware, software and systems for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |