USPTO serial 76002127
HIDDEN BRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIDDEN BRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hackensack, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARIA A. SAVIO
MARIA A SAVIO GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing high speed voice and data services, including without limitation local and long distance telephone service (dedicated and 1+), cable television service (cable and/or fiber optic), on-line service with direct Internet access services (DSL, dedicated and dial up) and various other Internet services and other technology related to the foregoing existing and yet to be developed, to the tenants of commercial and residential properties worldwide, including installation and wiring services relating thereto and providing wireless broadband Internet access to both commercial and residential buildings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |