USPTO serial 76002207
EDIGITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EDIGITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ingrid C. Llewellyn
INGRID C LLEWELLYN BRITTON SILBERMAN & CERVANTEZ461 2ND ST STE 332SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ONLINE RETAIL SERVICES FEATURING A VARIETY OF MULTIMEDIA GOODS RELATING TO MUSIC AND VIDEO ENTERTAINMENT, NAMELY, DOWNLOADABLE MUSIC AND VIDEO FILES AND RECORDINGS, ON-DEMAND PAY-PER-VIEW MOVIES, ON-DEMAND PAY-PER-LISTEN MUSIC FILES AND RECORDINGS, COMPACT DISCS, DVDS, PRE-RECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPES, LASER DISCS, AND MULTIMEDIA PLAYERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ONLINE ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING MUSIC, MUSIC VIDEOS, VIDEO AND FILM, MUSIC IDENTIFICATION, PICTURES OF RECORDING ARTISTS, ALBUM COVER GRAPHICS, SONG INFORMATION, ARTIST BIOGRAPHIES, RECORD REVIEWS, MUSIC AND ENTERTAINMENT RELATED NEWS, MUSIC LYRICS, AND CONCERT AND PURCHASE INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |