USPTO serial 76002301
BASICCARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2691708Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 25, 2003
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BASICCARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-32602 Vlotho, DE
D-32602 Vlotho, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Bruce Hamburg
C. Bruce Hamburg Norris McLaughlin, P.A.7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036-6524UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY MAGNETIC DATA RECORDING CARRIERS, DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY CARD READERS, NAMELY SMART CARD READERS, CARD WRITERS, NAMELY SMART CARD WRITERS AND CARDS, NAMELY SMART CARDS, WHICH CONTAIN SMALL MICROPROCESSORS EPROM MEMORY CIRCUITS AND COMPUTERS; BLANK MACHINE READABLE DATA CARRIERS; BLANK ELECTRONIC CHIP CARDS AND ENCODED ELECTRONIC CHIP CARDS CONTAINING PROGRAMMING USED FOR IDENTIFICATION, INSURANCE AND PATIENT INFORMATION; CODED CREDIT AND DEBIT CARDS; ELECTRONIC DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF INSURANCE AND PATIENTS RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 24, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 23, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 27, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |