USPTO serial 76002326
ONEHEALTHBANK.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONEHEALTHBANK.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Denise I. Mroz
DENISE I MROZ WOODCOCK WASHBURN KURTZ MACKIEWICZ ET AL1 LIBERTY PL FL 46PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others through a program awarding benefits to membership payment card users which later can be applied toward the cost of medical care | ACTIVE | Mar 3, 1999 |
| 036 | Electronic processing of medical insurance claims over a global communications network; financial transaction services, namely, crediting benefit points to member's payment card accounts which later can be applied toward the cost of medical care | ACTIVE | Mar 3, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |