Drawing for WE ARE MARKETS

USPTO serial 76002356

WE ARE MARKETS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE ARE MARKETS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Georges Nahitchevansky

GEORGES NAHITCHEVANSKY FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035On-line trading services in which seller posts products to be auctioned and bidding is done electronically via a global computer networkACTIVE—
036Financial services, namely brokerage services for transacting and trading of financial instruments; providing financial information, namely bids, offers, trades and sizes, trade execution and trade confirmation services; providing an electronic exchange for trading of financial instruments; providing a trading network via an electronic private intranet network and global computer network; and providing of information relating to financial instruments brokerage trading, investments, companies and financial markets through a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 26, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 17, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 17, 2003PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 1, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 21, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 11, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 3, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance