USPTO serial 76002357
ISPEED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ISPEED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Georges Nahitchevansky
GEORGES NAHITCHEVANSKY FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely brokerage services for transacting and trading of financial instruments and other products; providing financial information, including bids, offers, trades, and sizes trade execution and trade confirmation services; providing an electronic exchange for trading of financial instruments- providing a trading network via an electronic private intranet network and global computer network; providing information relating to financial instruments, brokerage, trading, investments, companies and financial markets through a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |