USPTO serial 76002512
CLASS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLASS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Goff
CHRISTOPHER M GOFF SENNIGER, POWERS, LEAVITT AND ROEDELONE METROPOLITAN SQ16TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs distributed to students for instruction and CD-ROMS distributed to students featuring courses of instruction, both in the fields of high school equivalency diploma certification and high school education | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed instructional materials, namely, instructional course materials distributed to students, in the fields of high school equivalency diploma certification and high school education | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction directly to students at the high school level over a global communication network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |