Drawing for FOXCOM

USPTO serial 76002621

FOXCOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOXCOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan T. Brown

PATRICK J JENNINGS PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP2300 N ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042DESIGN OF COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS FOR OTHERS; DESIGN OF ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS; DESIGN OF COMPUTER NETWORK COMPONENTS FOR OTHER; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A SITE ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FEATURING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERS AND E-COMMENCE SOFTWARE AND PROGRAM PRODUCTION; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, TESTING E-COMMERCE COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND PROGRAMS FOR OTHERS; COMMERCIAL ART DESIGN AND CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF COMMERCIAL ART DESIGN AND APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER SERVICES, NAMELY, HOSTING NETWORK AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS DESIGNED FOR USE AS ENGAGEMENT MANAGEMENT TOOLS SUCH AS PROJECT, RESOURCE, BUDGET AND TIME TRACKING MANAGEMENT VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 21, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 21, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 27, 2005CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 10, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance