Drawing for CHENG MENG

USPTO serial 76002647

CHENG MENG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHENG MENG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sanjiv D. Sarwate

SANJIV D SARWATE BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture; furniture parts; mirrors and picture frames; bed frames; headboards; furniture parts, namely, bed foot boards; drawers for storing goods under beds; beds, divans, bunk beds; furniture cabinets; chest of drawers; doors for furniture; rattan chairs; rattan tables; rattan dressers; rattan stools; rattan bed frames; rattan benches; rattan cabinets; rattan furniture screens; mattresses; window blinds; curtain rods; non-metal hooks for hanging curtains; plastic curtain tie-back hooks; cushions; shelves and shelving; bathroom furniture, namely, cabinets; tables; kitchen cabinets; furniture parts, namely, kitchen countertopsACTIVE—
037Furniture restoration; installation and maintenance of domestic central heating air conditioning apparatus; plumbing services; electrical installation services; installation, maintenance and repair of doors; furniture upholstering and upholstery repair; house painting; interior and exterior painting of commercial and business establishmentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance