USPTO serial 76002663
GENERAL JACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2948291Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2005
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GENERAL JACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alliance Tool Manufacturing, Inc.
Dallas, TX
Alliance Tool Manufacturing, Inc.
Dallas, TX
Alliance Tool Manufacturing, Inc.
Dallas, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Mason
ROBERT M MASON MASON & PETRUZZI402 CARILLON TWR W13601 PRESTON RDDALLAS, TX 75240Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Manually-operated stump and pole extractors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alliance Tool Manufacturing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Alliance Tool Manufacturing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Alliance Tool Manufacturing, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named GENERAL JACK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2002 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |