Drawing for PRESSPINS.COM

USPTO serial 76002981

PRESSPINS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRESSPINS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James E. Shlesinger

JAMES E SHLESINGER SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP3000 S EADS STARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING COMMEMORATIVE AND ORNAMENTAL PINS; ON-LINE AUCTION SERVICES FEATURING COMMEMORATIVE AND ORNAMENTAL PINS; PROVIDING MEMORABILIA TRADING SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 26, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 29, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 29, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 24, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 30, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 25, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 15, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance