USPTO serial 76002981
PRESSPINS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRESSPINS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Shlesinger
JAMES E SHLESINGER SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP3000 S EADS STARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING COMMEMORATIVE AND ORNAMENTAL PINS; ON-LINE AUCTION SERVICES FEATURING COMMEMORATIVE AND ORNAMENTAL PINS; PROVIDING MEMORABILIA TRADING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 29, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |