USPTO serial 76002989
EDAFLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EDAFLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Herman
JOHN C HERMAN KING & SPALDING191 PEACHTREE ST N EATLANTA, GA 30303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | facilitating business-to-business transactions by providing a website on the internet for others to buy, sell and trade goods and services; and the promotion of the goods and services of others by placing advertisements on a website accessed through the internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, an applications service provider that hosts an application that facilitates business-to-business transactions on a computer server; computer services, namely, hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; and providing a website on the internet featuring information about the apparel industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |