USPTO serial 76003069
HORIZONS PLANNING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HORIZONS PLANNING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Birmingham, AL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Analysis (Market) Analysis and consultation (Financial) | ACTIVE | Aug 6, 1997 |
| 036 | Brokerage (Insurance) Brokerage (Investment) Brokerage (Mutual Funds) Brokerage (Security) Brokerage (Stock) Estate Planning Financial analysis and consultation Financial forecasting Financial management Financial Planning Financial portfolio management Financial research Funds investment (Mutual) Funds investment Insurance agencies in the field of life and health Insurance consultation Investment (funds) Investment (Mutual funds) Investment advice Investment consultation (Fund) Investment consultation Investment management Investment of funds for others Management (Financial) Management (Investment) Planning (Estate) Planning (Financial) | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Aug 6, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |