USPTO serial 76003237
E-COMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-COMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick H. Gribbell
Carol G. Stovsky Standley Law Group LLP6300 Riverside DriveDublin, OH 43017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS THAT ALLOW A COLLEGE OR OTHER POST-SECONDARY SCHOOL ADMISSIONS OFFICE; TO IMPORT PROSPECT INFORMATION FROM THE COLLEGE'S OR POST-SECONDARY SCHOOL'S ADMISSION DATABASE, TO CREATE A STUDENT PROSPECT DATABASE AND MANAGE AND INTEGRATE STUDENT PROSPECT DATA FROM TESTING SERVICES, THIRD PARTY VENDORS, AND OTHER STUDENT INFORMATION, TO CREATE AND POST CUSTOM STUDENT FORMS, SURVEYS, AND EVENT RESPONSE FORMS, TO DEVELOP STUDENT PROSPECT CATEGORIES AND STUDENT PROSPECT FILTERS, TO SCHEDULE AND TRACK MAILINGS, TO CUSTOMIZE DATA ENTRY SCREENS FOR PHONE CALLS AND MAILINGS, AND TO REPORT ON STUDENT PROSPECT MESSAGES IN THE STUDENT PROSPECT DATABASE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |