USPTO serial 76003386
HOME KEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOME KEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew P. Bridges
ANDREW P BRIDGES WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Providing information in the field of home repair, up-keep, and improvement by means of electronic communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing referral, scheduling, and organizational services in the field of home repair, up-keep, and improvement; providing information pertaining to the home utility services of others; providing neighborhood and community information, namely information regarding local events, activities, places of interest, and community organizations; providing information in the field of home-related products for sale by others and home-related services provided by others; all of the foregoing provided by means of electronic communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |