USPTO serial 76003454
ANGEL GULLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 2004
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ANGEL GULLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Virginia, AU
Virginia, AU
Virginia, AU
Virginia, AU
MCLAREN VALE, AU
PETER JOHN CANALA AND DAVIDE GRENCI AS TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE DINA GRILLI
MCLAREN VALE, AU
Virginia, AU
Virginia, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH A. SEBOLT
JOSEPH A. SEBOLT SAND & SEBOLTAegis Tower, Suite 11004940 Munson St., NWCanton, OH 44718-3615Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely wines and fortified wines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GRILLI, JOSEPH
- Other trademarks owned by GRILLI, DINA
- Other trademarks owned by GRILLI, DINA
- Other trademarks owned by GRILLI, DINA
- Other trademarks owned by GRILLI, JOSEPH
- Other trademarks owned by PETER JOHN CANALA AND DAVIDE GRENCI AS TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE DINA GRILLI
- Other trademarks owned by GRILLI, JOSEPH
- Other trademarks owned by GRILLI, JOSEPH
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named ANGEL GULLY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS NOT UPDATED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 15, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |