USPTO serial 76003578
SHOCKING PINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHOCKING PINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VICTORIA'S SECFRET STORES, INC.
REYNOLDS, OH
VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
REYNOLDSBURG, OH
Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
REYNOLDSBURG, OH
New York, NY
New York, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUME AND COLOGNE SOLD IN APPLICANT'S SPECIALTY RETAIL STORES, CATALOGS AND WEBSITES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECFRET STORES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Intimate Beauty Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Intimate Beauty Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SHOCKING PINK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2009 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |