Drawing for TI GROUP AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 76003584

TI GROUP AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TI GROUP AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HAROLD J. MILSTEIN

HAROLD J MILSTEIN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP275 MIDDLEFIELD RDMENLO PARK, CA 94025-3506UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Ignition parts for internal combustion engines, namely, condensers and electronic ignitions; land and marine vehicle parts, namely, carburetors, fuel injectors; pumps, namely, fuel pumps, oil pumps, water pumps; engine management systems sold as a unit comprising one or more of the following-- carburetors, ignition modules, fuel injectors, mixing oil pumps, air filters, and fuel filters; fuel and vapor management systems for vehicle systems sold as a unit, consisting of fuel pumps, valves and fuel injectors, generator fuel pumps, turbine pumps, electronic control modules, sensor units for use in sensing fuel, vapor and emission levels; compressors for air conditioningACTIVE—
011Refrigeration apparatus, namely, evaporators, condensers, accumulators and heat exchangers, air conditioning units, and climate control systems, namely, air conditioners, heat exchangers, and heatersACTIVE—
012Parts and accessories for land vehicles, namely, engines, brakes, brake lines and fuel tanks; fuel and vapor management systems for vehicles sold as a unit consisting of; fuel tanks, filler pipes, filler necks, fuel reservoirs, rigid and flexible fuel lines, fuel line connectors, fuel reservoirs, fuel filters, fuel temperature sensors, fuel quality and energy sensors, fuel regulators, vapor purge valves, temperature sensors, vapor collection, storage units and fuel fill stop valves; fuel tanksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 22, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 15, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 10, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance