USPTO serial 76003747
LONDON SEASON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LONDON SEASON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LONDON WANDSWORTH, GB
LONDON WANDSWORTH, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DENNIS J. HELMS, ESQ.
DENNIS J HELMS FLASTER GREENBERG1810 CHAPEL AVE WCHERRY HILL, NJ 08002-4609UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN SOAPS; PERFUMES; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; COSMETICS, NAMELY, MAKEUP, MASCARA, BLUSH AND LIPSTICK; COSMETIC KITS, COMPRISING PRIMARILY MASCARA, BLUSH AND LIPSTICK; HAIR LOTIONS; DENTIFRICES; FRAGRANT TOILET WATER; FALSE EYELASHES; INCENSE; TISSUES IMPREGNATED WITH COSMETIC LOTIONS; BEAUTY MASKS; BATH GELS AND EYE GELS; SKIN LOTIONS AND SKIN CREAMS; POTPOURRI; SACHETS; SCENTED LINEN SPRAYS; SCENTED CLOSET SPRAYS; ROOM FRAGRANCES; AROMATHERAPY OILS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |