USPTO serial 76003851
MCSI MEDIA CONSULTANTS SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2820135Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 2004
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MCSI MEDIA CONSULTANTS SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dayton, OH
Dayton, OH
Miami Computer Supply Corporation
Dayton, OH
Miami Computer Supply Corporation
Dayton, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Kruse
PAUL W KRUSE BASS BERRY & SIMS PLCSTE 2700AMSOUTH CTR 315 DEADERICK STNASHVILLE, TN 37238-3001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION EQUIPMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA TELEPHONE, E-MAIL, POSTINGS ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND IN PERSON | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MCSI, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MCSI, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Miami Computer Supply Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Miami Computer Supply Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MCSI MEDIA CONSULTANTS SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |