USPTO serial 76003862
TELEFONICA DATA E-COMMERCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TELEFONICA DATA E-COMMERCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
28013 Madrid, ES
28013 Madrid, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE W. LEWIS
GEORGE W LEWIS JACOBSON, PRICE, HOLMAN & STERN, PLLC400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEPHONE, TELEGRAPH, TELEPHONY AND MESSAGE TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION SETS AND EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, LAND-LINE TELEPHONES, MOBILE TELEPHONES, TELEPHONE EXCHANGES, ANSWERING MACHINES, RADIOTELEPHONES, FAX MACHINES DATA PROCESSING DEVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER HARDWARE; MAGNETIC IDENTIFICATION CARDS, COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE WHICH FACILITATES SEARCH FOR AND TRANSFERRING INFORMATION ACROSS GLOBAL COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS AND FOR THE EXECUTION OF BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS USING GLOBAL COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, TELEPHONIC AND TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS, RENTAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND MESSAGE TRANSMISSION DEVICES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND DATA, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS, UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER CONSULTATION, ENGINEERING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Telefonica, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Telefonica, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TELEFONICA DATA E-COMMERCE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |