Drawing for TRANSENDA CENTRAL

USPTO serial 76004091

TRANSENDA CENTRAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANSENDA CENTRAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mikolean Morgan Longacre

MIKOLEAN MORGAN LONGACRE LONGACRE & ASSOCIATES1919 S EADS ST STE 401ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software module that is used to calculate and evaluate taxes, produce tax forms, interface with computer networks of others, create secure transmission of financial and confidential data and interface with other proprietary software of othersACTIVEMar 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 1, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 1, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 18, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance