Drawing for PICTURE ARCADE

USPTO serial 76004133

PICTURE ARCADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PICTURE ARCADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN A CULLIS

Robert E. Browne Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLPSuite 22002 North LaSalle StreetChicago, IL 60602

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software to allow users to create and distribute games and puzzles with digital imagesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 25, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Sep 17, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 23, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 16, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 16, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 16, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 16, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 17, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 6, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 9, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance