USPTO serial 76004349
SHISEIDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHISEIDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGELP O BOX 416SCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, BELTS, BOOTS, COATS, CORSETS, FOOTWEAR, SHOES, GLOVES, HATS, JACKETS, LEATHER JACKETS, NECKTIES, OVERCOATS, PAJAMAS, PANTS, SCARVES, SHIRTS, SKIRTS, STOLES, SUITS, SWEATERS, SWIMSUITS, TROUSERS AND VESTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2004 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |