USPTO serial 76004424
CLASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Goff
CHRISTOPHER M GOFF SENNIGER, POWERS, LEAVITT AND ROEDELONE METROPOLITAN SQ 16TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs used by students, featuring courses of instruction, both in the fields of high school equivalency diploma certification and at the high school education level; CD-ROMs used by students, featuring courses of instruction, both in the fields of high school equivalency diploma certification and at the high school education level | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed instructional materials, namely, instructional course materials distributed to students, in the fields of high school equivalency diploma certification and high school education | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction directly to students at the high school level over a global communication network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |