USPTO serial 76004693
TAGCD.COM DITIGAL MEDIA HANGTAGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAGCD.COM DITIGAL MEDIA HANGTAGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL ROBBINS
DANIEL ROBBINS LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL ROBBINS3346A INDUSTRIAL CTSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-1034UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS PACKAGED INSIDE A TAG WHICH MAY BE ATTACHED TO MERCHANDISE, USED TO ENABLE THE MANUFACTURER OF MERCHANDISE TO COMMUNICATE ABOUT THE MERCHANDISE, WITH THE BUYER OVER THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, WITH THE SOFTWARE AUTOMATICALLY TRANSMITTING INFORMATION ABOUT THE MERCHANDISE STYLE, ITEM NUMBER, SIZE, AND PRICE TO THE MANUFACTURER TO ENABLE THE MANUFACTURER TO PROVIDE AN INFORMED RESPONSE TO THE PURCHASER, AND GAIN INFORMATION ABOUT THE BUYER'S PURCHASING HABITS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | PROVIDING CUSTOMER PURCHASING INFORMATION TO MANUFACTURERS, NAMELY, INFORMATION ABOUT PARTICULAR ITEMS PURCHASED AND CUSTOMERS' PURCHASING HABITS FOR BUSINESS MARKETING AND BUSINESS CUSTOMER SERVICE PURPOSES, BASED ON INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COMPUTER SOFTWARE PACKAGED IN TAGS AFFIXED TO THE MERCHANDISE; AND DATA PROCESSING SERVICES, NAMELY, DATA PROCESSING OF THE FOREGOING INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by e.fitting, inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TRELLION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TRELLION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named TAGCD.COM DITIGAL MEDIA HANGTAGS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |