USPTO serial 76005323
EAGLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EAGLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Elk Grove Village, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JUDITH L. GRUBNER
JUDITH L GRUBNER MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLC401 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 1900CHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | aluminum soffitts and soffitt accessories made of metal, namely facia, channels, drip edges and trim coil; aluminum gutters and gutter rainwear accessories made of metal, namely, gutter coil, downspouts, elbows attached to gutters, end caps, mitres, pop rivets and pipe bands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |