USPTO serial 76005344
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M Graham Coleman 2d
M GRAHAM COLEMAN DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1633 BROADWAY 27TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motion picture films and television films featuring characters and other elements drawn from a series of original children's books and other print material; pre-recorded phonograph records, audiocassette tapes, videocassette tapes, and audio and video laser and compact discs featuring characters and other elements drawn from a series of original children's books and other print material; audiotape players and recorders; video cameras and videotape players; laser and compact disc players; and radios | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services; namely, production of motion picture, television and other audio-visual programs and juvenile fan clubs and activity groups associated with such programs | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |