USPTO serial 76005364
THIN MAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THIN MAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Commerce, CA
City of Commerce, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. Eichler
PETER M EICHLER CROSBY HEAFEY ROACH & MAY PC1901 AVE OF THE STARS STE 700LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, gin, scotch, bourbon, vodka, rum and rye | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |