USPTO serial 76005376
MAGICPHONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAGICPHONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, JP
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gene A. Tabachnick
GENE A TABACHNICK REED SMITH SHAW & MCCLAY LLPP O BOX 488PITTSBURGH, PA 15230-0488UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications goods, namely wireless communication apparatus, namely, modems, cellular and wireless telephones and answering machines, teleprinters, teletypewriters, portable computers, facsimile machines and wireless facsimile machines, radio pagers, personal communications equipment, namely, personal digital assistant (PDA) devices, namely, personal digital assistants (PDAs), personal digital assistant computers, specialty holster for carrying personal digital assistants, computer fax/modem cards, computer software for operating fax/modems, digital voice recorders, computer programs for operating telecommunications systems, computer programs for providing multiple-user access to global communications networks, digital and analog signal transmitters, receivers and converters, radio and telephone transmitters, receivers and servers, electronic mail computer hardware and software, and audio and visual teleconferencing equipment, namely consoles, terminals, televisions, video cameras, speakers, microphones, telephones, and associated circuitry sold together therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, providing online marketing services in the nature of banner advertising and display advertising for others, dissemination of advertising for others via the Internet; electronic retailing services via computer featuring general merchandise | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely escrow services, banking services and consultation rendered together therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Satellite-based communications services, and consultation rendered together therewith; Internet-based communications services, namely providing multiple-user access to global computer information networks for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information, and consultation rendered together therewith; Internet-based communications services, namely electronic transmission of data and documents via global computer information networks, and consultation rendered together therewith; and other media-based, namely telephone, communications services, and consultation rendered together therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consultation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Morimoto, Nobuyoshi
- Other trademarks owned by Morimoto, Nobuyoshi
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MAGICPHONE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 30, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |