USPTO serial 76005689
ECONOMIZATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATERS-PEREZ,KATHYRN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECONOMIZATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W.Dabney
JAMES W DABNEY PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-2711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, stationery, printed instructional and teaching materials regarding venture investment, Internet business, corporate finance, technology development and business management; operating manuals, leaflets, catalogues, brochures, pamphlets and books regarding venture investment, Internet business, corporate finance, technology development and business management | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS ADVICE AND CONSULTATION; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS ORGANIZATION, NAMELY, BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATION CONSULTATION; MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE; BUSINESS RESEARCH; BUSINESS PLANNING CONSULTATION; BUSINESS EVALUATIONS OF VENTURE INVESTMENT, INTERNET BUSINESS, CORPORATE FINANCE, TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consultation services in the field of computer hardware, software, networks and computer programming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |