USPTO serial 76006235
FEASA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2003
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with FEASA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Castletroy, County Limerick, IE
Castletroy, County Limerick, IE
Castletroy, County Limerick, IE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leigh Ann Lindquist
LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW, SUITE 9000WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | FIBER OPTICS APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS AND COMPONENTS, NAMELY, OPTICAL FIBER COUPLERS, FUSED TAPERED COUPLERS, FUSED TAPERED Y-JUNCTIONS, [ FUSED POLISHED COUPLERS, FUSED POLISHED POLARIZATION MAINTAINING FIBER COUPLERS, FUSED MONOLITHIC COUPLERS, DIFFUSED CORE SPLICES, FIBER POLARIZING BEAMSPLITTERS AND COMBINERS, ] OPTICAL SENSORS; [ MINIATURE TAPERED LOOPS AND MONOLITHIC MACH-ZEHNDER SUBSTRATES FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF ULTRA-STABLE DENSE WAVELENGTH DIVISION MULTIPLEXORS (WDMS); ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE AND/OR TESTING OF PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS, NAMELY, TEST FIXTURES, TEST BEDS AND BEDS OF NAILS TYPE TEST BEDS; ] ELECTRONIC APPARATUS FOR TESTING LIGHT EMITTING DEVICES AND THE COLOR OF LIGHT EMITTED FROM LIGHT EMITTING DEVICES; PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND FIRMWARE FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF TESTING OF PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 20, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 20, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |