Drawing for SMARTA

USPTO serial 76006247

SMARTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT G. WEILACHER

ROBERT G WEILACHER SMITH GAMBRELL & RUSSELL LLP1850 M ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5819UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Automatic vending machines for goods and services, namely, vending machines for making coinless payments and accessing individual functions by means of storage chip cards and processor chip cards; electronic apparatus, namely, computer hardware and electronic ticket issuing and handling computer hardware for the production and issue of user identity cards and for processing payments therefor; Electronic apparatus, namely, electronic automated counting devices for monitoring utilization of sports grounds, leisure parks, leisure installation, parking space, means of conveyance and visits to cultural eventsACTIVE—
042Monitoring the authorized use of, and payment for, sports grounds, leisure installations, parking spaces, means of conveyance, and visits to cultural events for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 15, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 28, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 11, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance