USPTO serial 76006264
JOE MAMA'S SOUP-A-RAMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2602058Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2002
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOE MAMA'S SOUP-A-RAMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ROCKVILLE, MD
Tinton Falls, NJ
Tinton Falls, NJ
Tinton Falls, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin Dziekonski
Kevin Dziekonski TST11311 Ashley DriveRockville, MD 20852UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services | EXPIRED | Jun 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DZIEKONSKI, KEVIN
- Other trademarks owned by Tierney, Michael
- Other trademarks owned by Tierney, Michael
- Other trademarks owned by Tierney, Michael
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named JOE MAMA'S SOUP-A-RAMA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 2, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 22, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CU.G | CONCURRENT USE GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |