USPTO serial 76006405
DEOATAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEOATAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan L. Heller
Susan L. Heller Greenberg Traurig LLP2450 Colorado AvenueSuite 400ESanta Monica, CA 90404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NON-ESSENTIAL OIL FRAGRANCES FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PERFUMERY, FLAVORINGS, COSMETICS, TOILETRIES AND HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS; AROMATIC CHEMICALS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PERFUMERY, FLAVORINGS, COSMETICS, TOILETRIES AND HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS; SYNTHETIC AROMA CHEMICALS, WITH ESSENTIAL OIL COMPONENT, FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PERFUMERY, FLAVORINGS, COSMETICS, TOILETRIES AND HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS; ENZYME PREPARATIONS FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES AND ENZYMES FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |