Drawing for FASTFLOW ASP

USPTO serial 76006451

FASTFLOW ASP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FASTFLOW ASP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL J. BEVILACQUA, ESQ.

DANIEL L SCALES TESTA, HURWITZ & THIBEAULT LLP125 HIGH STATTN TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORBOSTON, MA 2110

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software for managing, monitoring and measuring telecommunications systemsACTIVE—
038Communications services, namely an operations support system provided on a temporary basis, consisting of computer hardware and computer software providing automated administration of switches, transmission apparatus, and voice and data telecommunications networks for telecommunications service order management, inventory management, and service activationACTIVE—
042Non-downloadable software made available over the global computer network to manage, monitor and measure telecommunications systems, and technical consultation in the field of communications, computer and communications equipment consultation and technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer and communications hardware and software problems by telephone, e-mail, remote access to affected equipment and programs, and in personACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 19, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 19, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 19, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 17, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 23, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 2, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance