Drawing for MINDFARM

USPTO serial 76006551

MINDFARM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINDFARM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWIN KOMEN

EDWIN KOMEN ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLCSTE 4001050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING COURSES OF INSTRUCTION AND TRAINING IN MARKETING GOODS AND SERVICES VIA THE INTERNETACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 13, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 30, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 13, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 21, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 8, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance