Drawing for PHOTOSURF

USPTO serial 76006694

PHOTOSURF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHOTOSURF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Greenstein

MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET STSIXTEENTH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers, computer network servers, computer software for digital imaging and digital photography, digital cameras; video cameras; digital and electronic cameras for uploading to and downloading from computers, computer printers and scanners; wired or wireless communications terminals, and electronic personal organizers, and Internet and network web browser software, all for connecting to and exchanging information over the Internet and local area, wide area and enterprise networks; computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via the Internet or other computer networks; computer software used for the creation, enhancement, modification, transmission, reception, exchange, storage, and synchronization of information, messages, audio and video data and files, multimedia files, ephotos, photographic and graphic files and images, and wired or wireless e-mail with or without attached files, ephotos and images, and instruction manuals sold as a unit therewithACTIVE—
042Web site hosting for others; providing a web site that allows users to create, enhance, modify, store and synchronize information, audio and video data and files, multimedia files, ephotos, photographic and graphic files and images, and email with or without attached files, ephotos and images; and providing a web site that allows users to create greeting cards, memos, faxes, messages and announcements containing ephotos and/or digital images and other attached files or dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 13, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 2, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 14, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 12, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 5, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance