USPTO serial 76006800
MASTERCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MASTERCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Melbourne Victoria 3000, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD S. GARDNER
DONALD S GARDNER VAN DYKE GARDNER LINN & BURHART LLPP O BOX 888695GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49588-8695UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software including hardware and software for the healthcare industry; publications in electronic form supplied on-line from databases or from facilities provided on the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research, consulting, planning and implementation, assistance and supervision services in the field of computer technologies and out-sourcing including computer networks; network out-sourcing being the technical management and operation of networks for others; computer software design; design and implementation of IT solutions; consultancy in the field of computer hardware and software; healthcare services; clinical information systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |