USPTO serial 76007025
QUIMBOISE(E)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUIMBOISE(E)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
B-2950 Kapellen, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich,
BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use, namely, detergents, bleaches, fabric softeners, and stain removal preparations; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations for household use; soaps for all purpose household cleaning, skin soaps, body soaps, face soaps, bath soaps, face, body and skin scrubs and cleansers, essential oils for personal use, bath oils, massage oils, cosmetics, namely, lipsticks, mascaras, facial, body and eye make-ups, make-up powders, foundations, eye shadows, eyebrow pencils, cosmetic pencils, skin, facial and body lotions, creams, and moisturizers, non-medicated skin care preparations, non-medicated sun screen preparations, non-medicated sun tanning and sun enhancing preparations, skin lighteners, masks, perfumes and perfume oils, skin and facial toners, blushes, nail polishes and varnishes, eye creams, eye lotions, hand lotions, nail polish removers, make-up removers; non-medicated hair care preparations and dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 27, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |