USPTO serial 76007084
SUPRANET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPRANET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
9491 Ruggell, LI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES A OLIFF
JAMES A OLIFF OLIFF & BERRIDGE PLCP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | services in electronic telecommunication; online and computer services via a global computer network, allowing access to specific information provided by a computer information services; integrated data, image and language communication; data and image transmission via computer; multimedia services | ACTIVE | Feb 3, 2000 |
| 042 | consultation in questions of telecommunications; services of a databank; renting of access time to various interactive computer databanks, planning and projecting installations for telecommunication; installation of networks for third parties; providing programs for data processing; services for designing computer software and computer programs; services for computer shopping | ACTIVE | Feb 3, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |