USPTO serial 76007122
TRENDY ROSES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 3, 2002
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRENDY ROSES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Van Den Bos Quality Flowers International B.V.
2678 LV De Lier, NL
Other trademarks owned by Van Den Bos Quality Flowers International B.V.
Van Den Bos Quality Flowers International B.V.
2678 LV De Lier, NL
Other trademarks owned by Van Den Bos Quality Flowers International B.V.
Van Den Bos Quality Flowers International B.V.
2678 LV De Lier, NL
Other trademarks owned by Van Den Bos Quality Flowers International B.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN C HOLMAN
JOHN C HOLMAN JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLCTHE JEFFERSON BLDG400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | LIVING ROSES, SEEDS AND CUTTINGS THEREOF | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 22, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Van Den Bos Quality Flowers International B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Van Den Bos Quality Flowers International B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Van Den Bos Quality Flowers International B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named TRENDY ROSES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |