Drawing for FINDTHE DOT

USPTO serial 76007218

FINDTHE DOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FINDTHE DOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

K. Alison de Runtz

ANNEMARIE KAISER KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP14TH FL2040 MAIN STIRVINE, CA 92614

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Coded data devices comprised of compact arrangements of 64-bit coded data for interaction with wireless devices for processing information over a global computer network or for directing computer servers to generate, log, forward and manage such information; wireless electro-optic devices for reading, recognizing, validating, storing, transmitting and clearing coded data; software for personal computers, namely, software for creating coded data devices, software for receiving, processing and transmitting coded data from a coded data device, and software for receiving, processing and transmitting coded data from a computer server; USB receivers and software therefor; computer mice and software therefor; and software for global computer network servers, namely, software for delivering information over a global computer network and software for directing computer servers to generate, log, forward, and manage such informationACTIVE—
038Providing connections to a global computer network server for receiving coded data and transmitting, generating, and logging data in response theretoACTIVE—
042Custom design of 64-bit coded data devices for interaction with other wireless devices for processing information over a global computer network or for directing computer servers to generate, log, forward and manage such informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 26, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 4, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 2, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance