USPTO serial 76007245
INTELLIPOLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2845212Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 25, 2004
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTELLIPOLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Intelligent Optical Systems, Inc.
Torrance, CA
Intelligent Optical Systems, Inc.
Torrance, CA
Intelligent Optical Systems, Inc.
Torrance, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karin E. Peterka
KARIN E PETERKA BUCHALTER NEMER1000 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1500LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-2457UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Surveillance pole systems consisting primarily of sensors for sensing, monitoring, and detecting people, vehicles, chemical agents, biological agents, seismic events, smoke, and fire; fixed and movable closed circuit television cameras; electric lights; motion detectors; chemical and biological agent detectors; seismic detectors; smoke and fire detectors; intrusion, airborne agents, seismic events, smoke and fire precursor analyzers and detectors; fault tolerant, self-polling, cellular and fiber-optic communication networks consisting primarily of microprocessor-based interface units and optical, electronic and/or radio-frequency transmitters and receivers; computer software to monitor detectors, control closed circuit television cameras, and geographically pinpoint activation of any and all detectors; battery packed solar cell arrays; and, alternating current power supplies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 11, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Optical Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Optical Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Optical Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named INTELLIPOLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 21, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |