USPTO serial 76007319
ENEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jefferson F. Scher
JEFFERSON F SCHER CARR & FERRELL LLP2200 GENG RDPALO ALTO, CA 94303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, NAMELY, HARD DRIVES, DVD-ROM, DVD-RAM, MAGNETIC OPTICAL DRIVES, CD-RW, MONITORS, PRINTERS, WIRELESS LAN, SERVERS, COMPUTER CASES, USB HUBS, LAN CARDS, GRAPHIC CARDS, MOTHER BOARDS, COMPUTER POWER SUPPLIES; COMPUTER DEVICE DRIVER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER NETWORKING PERIPHERALS, NAMELY, INTERFACE CARDS AND RAID CARDS; USER MANUALS SUPPLIED AS A UNIT WITH THE FOREGOING | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | CONTRACT ASSEMBLY AND MANUFACTURING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SYNNEX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SYNNEX Information Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SYNNEX Information Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ENEX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |