USPTO serial 76007772
DT TITANIUM MMC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DT TITANIUM MMC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CH-2500 Biel 6, CH
CH-2500 Biel 6, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Schwartz
RICHARD L SCHWARTZ WHITAKER CHALK SWINDLE & SAWYER, LLP3500301 COMMERCE STFT WORTH, TX 76102-4186Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | BICYCLES AND PARTS THEREOF, NAMELY, EXPANDERS, STANDS, BAR ENDS, SEAT POSTS, HUBS, SPOKES, SPOKE NIPPLES, RIMS, RIM TAPES, CRANKS, TIRES, HANDLE BARS, STEMS, MUDGUARDS, MUDGUARD FASTENING RODS, AND LUGGAGE CARRIERS; MOTORCYCLES AND PARTS THEREOF, NAMELY, HUBS, SPOKES AND SPOKE NIPPLES, RIMS, RIM TAPES, CRANKS, TIRES, HANDLE BARS, STEMS, MUDGUARDS, MUDGUARD FASTENING RODS, AND LUGGAGE CARRIERS; HUBS FOR WHEELCHAIRS | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |