USPTO serial 76007817
MEDBAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRUNDY, JUDITH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDBAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CURTIS A VOCK
CURTIS A VOCK LATHROP & GAGE, L C4845 PEARL E CIR STE 302BOULDER, CO 80301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line retail services featuring medical products and supplies; providing a web site of information on business services rendered by others; promoting the goods and services of others by providing a web site at which users can link to on-line retailers and manufacturers of medical products and supplies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing a web site containing medical information and providing a web site of information on medical products and supplies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Schaffer, Robin
- Other trademarks owned by Schaffer, Robin
- Other trademarks owned by MEDBAND, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MEDBAND
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |