USPTO serial 76008094
SCOOTERGOLF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCOOTERGOLF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greensboro, NC
Greensboro, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JACK B HICKS
JACK B HICKS WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICEPO BOX 7037ATLANTA, GA 30357-0037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motorized bike for transporting golfers and golf clubs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |