Drawing for UPTIME GUARDIAN

USPTO serial 76008335

UPTIME GUARDIAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with UPTIME GUARDIAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James H. Walters

James H. Walters patenttm.usPO Box 82788PORTLAND, OR 97282-0788UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE TO MONITOR AND REPORT ON THE PROPER FUNCTIONING OF REMOTELY PLACED PERIPHERALS, NAMELY, AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINES, AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE CASH DISPENSERS, AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE PRINTERS, AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE PAPER SUPPLIES, ELECTRONIC COMMERCE TERMINALS; AND COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO MONITOR AND REPORT ON THE PROPER FUNCTIONING OF AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINESACTIVE—
042MONITORING AND REPORTING THE FUNCTION AND OPERATION OF REMOTELY PLACED PERIPHERALS, NAMELY, AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINES, AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE CASH DISPENSERS, AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE PRINTERS, AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE PAPER SUPPLIES, ELECTRONIC COMMERCE TERMINALS; AND, MONITORING AND REPORTING THE FUNCTION AND OPERATION OF AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 11, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 27, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 13, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 13, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 27, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 17, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 17, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 17, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 17, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 17, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 17, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 16, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 13, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 7, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 12, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 12, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 12, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 1, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 5, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 1, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 1, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 1, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 1, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 22, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 6, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance